Headlines
Legislature passes second deadline with unsure path toward adjournment
With the first and second deadline passing on Friday, committees in both the House and especially the Senate saw agendas with a lengthy list of bills. While the Senate is passing some omnibus bills, the House has not moved many omnibus bills out of committee, with the House Republican caucus committing to move bills individually instead. Omnibus bills are seen as bad process, but lawmakers rely on them as the best way to pass a large number of bills. On Friday Ways and Means co-chair Rep. Paul Torkelson (R-Hanska) confirmed what many at the capitol had assumed, that the House won’t be setting budget targets for committees. Without budget targets the goal is for committees move more bills individually, but many House committees are struggling with that given the 50-50 split across each committee.
In many ways the process this year stands in strong contrast to how the House operated last year. 2025 was a budget session so it forced the House’s hand to pass budget bills with targets in place to reduce deficit issues the state was facing in future bienniums. House floor sessions were largely perfunctory last year, without having extended debate since the parties were working together to pass budget bills. This year the two parties are frequently trading turns moving to suspend the rules to take up bills that they’re prioritizing, even if they know garnering any votes from the other side of the aisle. Put simply, once the House got organized at 67-67 last year, both parties were acting like the majority. This year, they’re both acting like the minority.
Path toward the end of session
While the outlook for the end of session is murky at best now, it’s important to remember that deals can come together quickly at the Capitol. While those deals will be harder to reach without the traditional structure of committees negotiating large omnibus bills in conference committee, they can still certainly come together. When leaders agree on what legislation to move, the structure of how it moves isn’t as essential. The legislation moves. The question is whether they’ll be able to get that kind of agreement in the current atmosphere at the capitol when there will be less pressure to make deals without the traditional structure in place.
When asked about how legislation would advance in an environment with a fractured approach to how bills move, Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy said “They (larger senate bills) might not have a corresponding partner but they may have pieces of those bills. We have an uneven path in terms of how we are matching things up.”
House DFL Caucus Leader Zack Stephenson didn’t see things immediately turning around once the legislature returns from break but viewed the door as still open to get things done at the end of session. He compared this moment to how difficult it was in 2025. “I don’t know if it’s ever been worse than it was at that point (first day of the 2025 legislative session). And we were able to get a budget done without a shutdown. And that’s why I say this isn’t over and there’s a lot of session left.”
MICA priorities move forward in the Senate
This past week the Senate moved bills through committees regarding IT Modernization, modifying the African American Family Preservation and Child Welfare Disproportionality Act, and addressing the SNAP cost share. The IT modernization moved through both Health & Human Services as well as State and Local Government. In the State and Local Government Committee the bill was amended, creating a Legislative Commission on Human Services Systems. The commission would be composed of six members from each of the House and Senate, evenly split between parties. Sen. Wiklund said that the intent of the commission would be to address the long term issues in addition to the short term issues in the underlying bill that the Human Services Steering Committee composed of county appointees and state agency officials. Sen. Wiklund said that another advantage of the legislative commission is that it could receive reports from the steering committee and improve legislative expertise on the IT modernization issues that the state and counties are facing. Sen. Mark Koran spoke in favor of the amendment and the bill was passed to the Rules committee. There’s been broad bipartisan buy in on IT modernization in the House as well, though different language is under consideration. Language modifying the act was laid over for possible inclusion in the Senate as well as the SNAP cost share language.
