Headlines
Governor Walz makes final state of the state address
On Tuesday April 28 Governor Walz made his final state of the state address before both the Minnesota House and Senate. This year the address is coming later than usual, so the speech was less focused on what to prioritize during the remaining weeks of session but instead of looking back at the Governor’s time in office overall as well as the issues that have dominated headlines at the state and federal level over the last year.
When he did speak about the legislative session, it was mostly highlighting his priorities from the supplemental budget recommendations released last month. They included:
- A significant increase in the dependent care credit for families paying child care expenses, especially for children six and younger
- Increasing spending in a first-time homebuyer account
- Providing relief to businesses that were impacted by Operation Metro Surge
- A new tax on social media companies
- A $907 million bonding bill (smaller than the amounts proposed by House and Senate DFLers or the House Republicans)
But the speech overall was focused on what the Governor viewed as the major accomplishments of his time in office, which were largely passed during the 2023 legislative session. Most relevant to counties near the end of the speech he mentioned his proposal to overhaul how human service systems are administered, saying “I want us to move away from a complex, layered administration managed by a patchwork network of counties, managed care organizations, and state agencies. Towards a single model, where a single centralized agency can make sure they have control before the money goes out the door to ensure it gets out efficiently.”
The reply from House and Senate Republican leaders raised issue with the lack of focus on addressing fraud during the Governor’s speech, noting that his comments on it all came near the very end of his speech. Speaker Lisa Demuth said, “Property taxes are incredibly high right now, prices at every business in Minnesota are high because of mandates that have been put on specifically during 2023 and 2024, full Democrat control in the state of Minnesota.”
When following up after the Republican response Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy said that “there is no special session, we are going to get done with our work.” She noted conference committees or working groups could start meeting this week. When asked about how the process would work with bills not matching up between the House and Senate, House DFL Caucus Leader Zack Stephenson noted “When there’s a will there’s a way. If members and leaders want to do things in those areas, we will figure out a way to make the mechanics work.”
The reality is that as leadership negotiations continue this week many rank and file legislators may be in the dark. We’re creeping closer to the fishing opener deadline that Governor Walz set weeks ago to come to universal targets by. Even if leaders do reach universal targets by then, it’s a very short turnaround to May 17 if there’s any momentum to pass larger bills. If there’s a breakthrough it will have to come at the leader level. But having conversations with your legislators, especially chairs, is as valuable as ever because leadership listens to their members and caucus and respond to pressure from them.
MICA Legislative Priorities Update
All three county priorities are included in the Senate Health and Human Services omnibus bill (SF4612/ Wiklund), which passed the Senate floor on a vote of 34-32 on Wednesday. Below is more detail on the current status of the three MICA priorities in the that bill as well as a few talking points if you have conversations with legislators on the topic.
Technology Modernization: The bill includes a version of SF4719 (Wiklund) on which we have been engaged since the beginning of session. The language includes our steering committee language that gives counties an equal voice with the state in the development and prioritization of modernization projects. It includes funding of $45 million in FY26-27 and $25 million in FY28-29.
- Ensuring a county role in oversight of modernization projects and spending is essential so that the legislature and counties have a better understanding of where dollars are being spent.
- In 2023 the legislature appropriated $200 million but left the language vague and with little oversight, we don’t want to repeat that experience.
- Making essential investments in outdated technology systems from the 1990s can be an important tool in preventing fraud
- Counties have both short and long term technology modernization needs. We need to address the long term vision AND we need the essential projects included in SF4612 (Senate HHS bill) to pass this year.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: The Senate includes funding to address cost shifts to the state from the federal government relating to SNAP by specifically holding counties harmless from the non-federal cost shifts. This includes the portion of the SNAP benefit costs based on “error rates” and covering lost federal administrative reimbursement for state information technology systems. The state picking up the benefit share totals $10.107 million in FY26-27 and $194.124 million in FY28-29; whereas the administrative costs total $24.286 million in FY26-27 and $64.762 million in FY28-29.
- The federal law changes around SNAP represent the most significant property tax shifts onto counties that we’ve seen considered at the capitol the last few sessions if the legislature fails to act
- The SNAP changes at the federal level hurt counties on numerous levels, reducing funding to carry out the mandate while simultaneously requiring counties to do new work with less funding
- Unless the state intervenes we expect property tax levies to continue increasing the next two years to cover this budget shift, that’s not the outcome counties or either side of the aisle wants at the capitol.
- Supporting the language in the Senate HHS bill is absolutely necessary if the state wants to address this problem.
MAAFPCWDA Modifications: We also have a positive position on our request to resource and effectively implement the Minnesota African-American Family Preservation and Child Welfare Disproportionality Act. This includes $15 million per year to counties for administration and implementation, as well as requiring DCYF to conduct case reviews of 10% of certain child protection cases.
- Under current law this law is going into effect on January 1, 2027. There is general agreement to have DCYF pick up a percentage of case reviews of certain child protection cases, that’s an essential law change that we need to pass this year if the legislature wants this law to be successful
- Counties are facing enormous amounts of pressure on the property tax levy. Changing this from an unfunded mandate to a funded one would help ensure that the law achieves what it sets out to.
House Ethics Committee
On Friday the House Ethics Committee heard complaints against Representatives Elliot Engen, Walter Hudson, and Alex Falconer. The complaint against Rep. Engen and Rep. Hudson were focused on the two leaving a House Education Committee hearing to have lunch and drink beer several blocks from the State Capitol while the committee hearing continued. The complaint against Rep. Falconer was over an alleged conflict of interest for doing lobbying work while serving as a legislator. The committee met on and off throughout the day. The complaints were ultimately dismissed against all three members. Ethics Committee Co-Chair Greg Davids mentioned that both decisions were unanimous, and that’s an unusual result in his experience. The committee did release a statement clarifying the expectations and norms of committee members, saying members should be in committee.
Omnibus bill tracking
Figuring out exactly what bills match up where and what is traveling and what isn’t is more challenging than typical this year. MICA is providing an omnibus bill tracker to help, that will be periodically updated on our website. But with such an abnormal session and process, the caveats to this bill tracker are bigger than ever. Language could be moved from one bill to another. An old conference committee left open from 2025 could re-open with brand new language in consideration. A supplemental omnibus bill could be added as a last minute amendment to a single subject stand alone bill. That said, this should be a useful tool over the next week to figure out where we are in the process.
